Friday, February 14, 2025

False Flag Operation at City Hall


SF sheriff's letter (Red underline added)
In an obvious false flag operation three men claiming to be part of DOGE invaded SF City Hall and a school district building. [bold added]
Three men wearing MAGA hats, Department of Government Efficiency T-shirts and fake badges stormed several offices inside San Francisco City Hall and a nearby school district building on Friday demanding that workers hand over sensitive documents, sources said...

[Sheriff's spokeswoman Tara] Moriarty said City Hall workers refused the intruders' requests and called sheriff’s deputies, at which time the individuals fled the building. Moriarty said the Sheriff’s Office doesn’t believe that the individuals were actually representatives from DOGE.

Then at about 12:40 p.m., a San Francisco Unified School District worker who works in an administrative building at 135 Van Ness Ave. said that three men matching the description of the City Hall intruders walked inside the former school making similar demands.

The worker, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they’re not authorized to speak to media, said that the three men stunned school district workers when they got past security and started walking up and down the hallways “being rowdy” and harassing random people.

The worker said the three men freely walked through the building while videotaping workers on their phones before leaving 10 minutes later. She described them as young guys in their 20s who were intentionally trying to provoke people. One of them had a badge with an expletive on it.

“They came in saying ‘we are DOGE, what are you doing?’ to people,” the employee said. “They told one woman that she’d be fired by Monday. I thought it was strange, but some other people might’ve been afraid.”
It could be a sign of how much the political and media landscape has changed that both San Francisco officials and the Chronicle stated upfront that Elon Musk and DOGE were not responsible.

The attempt was amateurish, the intent to provoke was obvious, and luckily everyone kept their cool. I hope these guys are caught quickly and the book is thrown at them.

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Four Lights

There are four lights! (Star Trek reference)
When it came time to replace the 40-watt bulbs in the bathroom, only the white LED product was available at Home Depot. Because having a mixture of lights was not esthetically pleasing, I removed the incandescents and stored them away.

When the leftmost LED burned out this week, I reached for an incandescent. I had forgotten how much a warmer light changes the mood, and I will go back to the old bulbs now that President Trump's EPA will allow them again, along with the older-standard showers, toilets, washing machines and dishwashers.

(We may not have heard the last word about President Trump's action, because the energy-efficient regulations were based on the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. The Act, in my humble non-lawyerly opinion, does not mandate specific energy criteria for consumer lightbulbs, leaving the details to the Secretary of Energy. Under President Biden consumer incandescents were banned by the Department of Energy, and President Trump's rescinding of the ban is within the latter's authority. Of course, I could be wrong...)

Wednesday, February 12, 2025

CA Water: Following the Rule Curve

February storms have dispelled concerns over a dry January: [bold added]
So much rain fell in the first week of February that California’s largest reservoir, Shasta Lake, near Redding, rose 22 feet. Shasta Lake is 34 miles long. The watershed at the state’s second-largest, Lake Oroville, in Butte County, has received 24 inches of rain in the past two weeks — five times the historical average — sending the reservoir level up 23 feet from Feb. 1 to Feb. 7.

And now a new atmospheric river storm is forecast to soak the Bay Area and the rest of the state Thursday and Friday...

The rain has been so plentiful that operators of the largest reservoirs have been increasing water releases in recent days to make space for the latest storm.

The outlet valves at Shasta Dam on Tuesday,
Feb. 11 (Merc/U.S. Bureau of Reclamation)
At Shasta Lake, federal dam operators have let out 60,000 cubic feet per second since Saturday through the outlet valves at the massive Shasta Dam. That’s 450,000 gallons a second, the equivalent of 40 Olympic swimming pools every minute.

It’s a delicate balancing act, experts say. If reservoirs fill to the top too quickly in big storms, large amounts of water are released down their spillways, causing flooding to homes and communities downstream. In extreme cases, water can overtop dams, causing a risk of failure.

Operators at most large dams in California rely on a manual called a “rule curve” that is set by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Evaluating decades of rainfall patterns, it recommends the highest level that each reservoir should be kept at every day, an amount that gradually increases later in the spring as winter storms dissipate.

“You are playing the odds,” [UC-Davis professor Jeff] Mount said. “What you are trying to do is balance the risk of not ending up with enough water in the spring against the risk of having too much in the winter, where you’ll get flooding.”
California is extremely lucky; says Professor Mount, "It’s unusual to get three wet years in a row.”

The men and women who operate our water infrastructure are doing an excellent job managing a complex system that is subject to both physical and manmade (make sure the fish get their share!) constraints.

Although funding was approved by the voters in 2014, it's a pity that, eleven years later, the Progressives who run the State haven't built any water storage to take advantage of the rain (the estimated completion date of the Sites reservoir is 2032).

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

The GOAT of Scrabble

The term "GOAT" (Greatest Of All Time) originated as a self-description by Muhammad Ali and has since fueled many a sports debate, particularly in professional basketball (LeBron James vs Michael Jordan) and football (Tom Brady vs Joe Montana, until Brady pulled away by amassing a total of seven championships late in his career).

Nigel Richards (Brady/PA/Zuma Press/WSJ)
There is no controversy, however, about the GOAT of Scrabble: [bold added]
Nigel Richards is the reigning world champion of Scrabble in Spanish. Just don’t ask him to order a coffee in Madrid. The 57-year-old New Zealander doesn’t speak a lick of Spanish.

During the deciding match in November’s Spanish World Scrabble Championship in Granada, Spain, Richards racked up triple-word scores with ENRUGASE (“to wrinkle up”) and ENHOTOS (an archaic word for “familiarity”), before clinching victory with TRINIDAD and SABURROSA (an obscure word that describes the coated residue of the tongue).

Not that Richards knew the meaning of any of those words.

One Spanish TV broadcaster called his win the “ultimate humiliation.” The global Scrabble community wasn’t so surprised. Richards had done this before—in French.

When he won that language’s Scrabble world championship in 2015 and again in 2018, he could greet his opponents with bonjour but couldn’t say much else.

What Richards lacks in linguistic ability he more than makes up for with an encyclopedic memory and an unrivaled ability to decode patterns, according to friends and opponents.

“He memorizes words as soon as he reads them once,” said Hector Klie, who has represented the U.S. in Scrabble since 2003 and competes in Spanish. “He doesn’t know whether a word is a verb, noun, adjective or any other grammatical form that would typically help native speakers learn words more easily. For him, all words are equal in his memory, and he doesn’t need to know their meaning.

Richards is also the undisputed GOAT in English-language Scrabble, having won five world titles. He is currently ranked No. 1 by the World English-language Scrabble Player’s Association.

“We are witnessing someone who could be compared to, or even surpass in intellectual capacity, figures like Bobby Fischer, Garry Kasparov or Magnus Carlsen in chess,” said Klie, the Spanish World Championship runner-up in 2004.
The parallel to Nigel Richards that comes to mind is the large language models (LLMs) that are used in artificial intelligence. LLMs don't "know" anything in a traditional epistemological sense but are able to give the appearance of knowing by examining billions of pieces of information on the internet, recognizing patterns, and regurgitating answers that follow those patterns.

Of course, this means that someday a computer will beat Nigel Richards at Scrabble.

Monday, February 10, 2025

Crossing a Red Line That You Can't See

Beginning January 1st, California has banned parking within 20 feet of a crosswalk. The purpose of the "daylighting" law is to make pedestrians more visible to drivers who may not see them crossing because of parked vehicles.

(Illustration from Trumbull/Chronicle)
San Francisco had begun ticketing such closely parked cars although there were no warning signs or curbs painted red. [bold added]
After confronting a stiff outcry from residents and elected leaders, San Francisco’s transportation agency has scrapped plans to ticket motorists who park in unmarked “daylighting” zones near crosswalks, the agency’s director said Monday.

Previously, officials at the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency intended to cite any driver who parks within 20 feet of a crosswalk — the safety buffer mandated by California’s new daylighting law — regardless of whether or not the curb is painted red...

While citations for parking in red zones carry a $108 fine, SFMTA had proposed lowering the penalty to $40 if the 20 foot buffer was not marked. Strained by limited resources, transportation staff said it would take years to paint curbs throughout the city, so the reduced fine represented a compromise.

But San Franciscans balked. Kirschbaum said that when she met with members of the public, they brought up the daylighting enforcement plan over and over again. City supervisors echoed their misgivings, saying the $40 tickets were unfair. When Kirschbaum relayed their feedback to new Mayor Daniel Lurie, she said he supported her idea to quash the $40 fines...

SFMTA announced a retreat. Drivers who park at red curbs will still be ticketed; those who park at unmarked gray curbs will not, even if they are within 20 feet of a crosswalk.

Besides nixing the $40 tickets, the agency will also accelerate its process for striping curbs to comply with the daylighting law. Transportation planners are now giving themselves 18 months to coat all the daylight zones in red paint, a far more compressed schedule than the initial projection of four to five years.
Comments:

1) the daylighting law has a lot to commend it. Some pedestrians dash into crosswalks where views are blocked by parked trucks or SUVs.

2) people draw the line at protecting the public if it means taking away their parking space!

3) "Ignorance of the law is no excuse": no one seems to believe that any more with the many thousands of rules and regulations that the average person has to deal with.

Sunday, February 09, 2025

That Old-Timey Phrasing

Duccio di Buoninsegna, “The Calling of the Apostles
Peter and Andrew,” 1308-1311 (public domain)
Today's lectionary Gospel from Luke 5:5-11 is the one about the disciples filling their nets with fish: [bold added]
Simon answered,"Master, we have worked all night long but have caught nothing. Yet if you say so, I will let down the nets." When they had done this, they caught so many fish that their nets were beginning to break. So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them. And they came and filled both boats, so that they began to sink.

But when Simon Peter saw it, he fell down at Jesus' knees, saying, "Go away from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man!" For he and all who were with him were amazed at the catch of fish that they had taken; and so also were James and John, sons of Zebedee, who were partners with Simon. Then Jesus said to Simon, "Do not be afraid; from now on you will be catching people." When they had brought their boats to shore, they left everything and followed him.
Matthew 4:18-22 omits the fish story:
And Jesus, walking by the sea of Galilee, saw two brethren, Simon called Peter, and Andrew his brother, casting a net into the sea: for they were fishers.

And he saith unto them, Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.

And they straightway left their nets, and followed him.

And going on from thence, he saw other two brethren, James the son of Zebedee, and John his brother, in a ship with Zebedee their father, mending their nets; and he called them.

And they immediately left the ship and their father, and followed him.
I prefer Matthew's version for two reasons:

1) the lesson of the story is not about the miracle catch of fish--which no mortal can emulate--but how Simon, James, and John answered the call to follow Jesus. Do not be distracted by shiny (or scaly) objects.

2) I simply prefer the old-timey phrasing of the King James version. "Fishers of men" is memorable, "catching people" is instantly forgotten.

Saturday, February 08, 2025

Elon Musk Defends his Actions at the U.S. Treasury

Elon Musk describes the basic omissions the DOGE team has found in the payments system at Treasury. The procedures and information that are missing are essential to the accounting operations of even small businesses--just ask any bookkeeper who uses Quicken.

But I, for one, am open to hearing a response from someone in the current financial chain-of-command. For example, one explanation that the system actually works is that the account-code information is contained in another payables subsystem that isn't upwardly linked. (I doubt that, frankly, because the DOGE kids are supposedly mapping all the systems and their functions, but they could have missed something.)

Meanwhile, until a plausible reason is provided, the benefit of Elon and his boys continuing their work far far outweighs the risk that a few of them will go rogue and sell Social Security numbers to crooks.

The full text:

To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:

- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible.

- All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING!

- The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily.

The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE. It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already!

Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of entitlements payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious.

When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!!

This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.

Friday, February 07, 2025

Saving California from Itself

In 2012 I expressed skepticism about the just-approved high-speed rail (HSR) project:
But they're going to start in the middle, i.e., the Central Valley, where the labor and land are cheaper and environmental obstacles less restrictive. After the expenditure of an estimated $6 billion, HSR will be operational between Fresno (pop. 350,000) and Bakersfield (pop. 500,000) in 2017...

Just to make clear, your humble observer is not in favor of the HSR project. It's expense ($65 billion in today's dollars and $90+ billion, including inflation ) is only defensible under the wildest pie-in-the-sky scenarios. When one looks at the sad history of California construction overruns in projects like the Bay Bridge extension, San Francisco airport, and BART, it is even more improbable that the final cost will be justified, and it won't matter much whether it was built top-down, bottom-up, or middle-out.
Support pillars in Hanford (Merc photo)
13 years later HSR has played out as foreseen: $billions over budget, decade-long delays, and no guaranteed funding to finish it. Even many of its former supporters agree that HSR is a white elephant, but very few have publicly advocated abandoning it.

This time around (he failed to do so in his first term) President Trump will likely be able to kill the project given the weakened state of his opposition:
“The train that’s being built between Los Angeles and San Francisco is the worst-managed project I think I’ve ever seen, and I’ve seen some of the worst,” Trump told reporters, asserting that the project is “billions and billions” of dollars over budget.

“We’re going to start a big investigation of that, because I’ve never seen anything like it,” he added. “Nobody’s ever seen anything like it. The worst overruns that there have ever been in the history of our country.”

...The current estimate for linking San Francisco with Southern California is $107 billion. Officials don’t even know how to fully finance Merced-Bakersfield, much less raise the other $72.4 billion they would need.
By pulling the plug President Trump will be saving California from itself, but I doubt anyone in Sacramento will thank him.

Thursday, February 06, 2025

Fear-mongering by DOGE Opponents

When I was a junior auditor in the mid-1970's, I had access to thousands of client employees' personnel and payroll records. The payroll system generated major expenses, and line-by-line examination of gross pay, benefits, tax withholdings, and other deductions (e.g.,union dues, court-ordered child support) was required to prepare the financial statements.

Accounting departments for the most part were cooperative, but if we did encounter difficulties, we kicked the request to the CFO and CEO. For us to do our job efficiently we had to have complete access to personnel records, including the W-4 withholding form that disclosed the employee Social Security number.

Management is ultimately responsible for the financial statements, and independent CPA's opine as to their integrity. Every year thousands of auditors--not only from CPA firms but also from government agencies like the FDIC and state insurance regulators--descend upon businesses and inspect millions of employee records. Although there are thousands of potential leakers, I don't recall any politicians who have expressed concern about privacy issues in our system of financial reporting.

I mention all of the above in order to express my puzzlement at the criticism directed at President Trump's examination of the financial records of the Executive Branch, of which he is the "CEO." Is he not Constitutionally responsible for its operations? And doesn't he have the authority to hire whomever he wants (subject to them being qualified and passing a security check) to do the work? A non-disclosure agreement or similar document should allay privacy concerns.

As a 23-year-old I was a pretty good auditor, but my skills were not in the same league as the young men who are working 24/7 for the Department of Government Efficiency. They have been tasked with analyzing where trillions of dollars go every year:
Gavin Kliger, left, and Ethan Shaotran, right (Merc photo)
Six men aged 19 to 24 — most with strong Bay Area connections — have been identified as associates of the controversial, Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency, aka DOGE, that has gained unprecedented access to several federal agencies, including the Department of the Treasury...

A Harvard University bio of [Ethan] Shaotran lists two papers he wrote — one on pursuit of human-surpassing AI, another on improvement of self-driving vehicles — and a 111-page book published on Amazon about using AI for stock predictions. The bio identified him as the founder of Energize.AI, a “scheduling assistant for professionals,” and said he has filed patents related to AI computer vision, and logistical systems. Affiliations with the Harvard Mountaineering Club and work as a scuba dive master in Hawaii are also cited in the bio.

Another of the young DOGE crew was reported to be Gavin Kliger, whose LinkedIn profile touts a position as a full-time “special advisor to the director” in the Office of Personnel Management. He earned a bachelor’s degree in 2020 from UC Berkeley in electrical engineering and computer science, the school said. Kliger worked at Twitter for less than a year in 2019 during college, according to the profile. Between graduating from UC Berkeley and this January, Kliger worked in software engineering for San Francisco tech company Databricks, according to his profile.

A former Eagle Scout with a black belt in Tae Kwon Do, Kliger enjoyed playing piano and clarinet, along with online speed chess, the profile said.

A Vox reporter on Monday posted on X a screenshot of an email, purportedly informing USAID workers that the agency’s Washington, D.C., headquarters were closed, and indicating replies should go to a USAID email address that appeared to belong to Kliger.

The second UC Berkeley student is Akash Bobba, who pursued a triple major in electrical engineering, computer science and business administration from 2021 until this January, but has not graduated, according to the school. According to Wired, Bobba interned at Menlo Park social-media giant Meta, and at Palantir, a Denver intelligence and military software company co-founded in Palo Alto by Thiel, an influential conservative Silicon Valley billionaire closely tied to Musk.

Also connected to Thiel is Luke Farritor, said by Wired to have a working email address in the federal General Services Administration, and to have interned at SpaceX. Farritor is a Thiel Fellow, receiving a two-year, $100,000 grant awarded to people under 22 “who want to build new things instead of sitting in a classroom,” according to the Thiel Foundation.

The fifth young worker identified as working for DOGE is Edward Coristine, who according to Wired “appears to have recently graduated from high school and to have been enrolled at Northeastern University.” The magazine said a copy of his resume shows he spent three months at Neuralink, a Musk-founded company developing brain-computer interface to treat paralysis.
It doesn't trouble me that these brilliant whiz-kids are doing the leg work for Elon Musk, who in turn reports to Donald Trump. These young men will make $millions in tech, if that's what they choose to do with their lives. The danger of any of them selling Social Security numbers, IMHO, is nil, and trumpeting that issue is an obvious attempt to kill or delay their work. Onward, guys, and thank you for your service.

Wednesday, February 05, 2025

Democrats: You Created Your Own Destructor

President Trump will sign an Executive Order that will keep biological males out of women's sports in schools and colleges.
Trump will sign an order titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports” Wednesday afternoon, said people familiar with the matter, including a White House official and a member of Congress...

It wasn’t immediately clear exactly what the contents of the order would entail, but one option is for the president to direct the Education Department to interpret federal Title IX rules as barring the participation of transgender girls and women in female sports categories. People on different sides of the issue have anticipated that the department would then base its policies and future regulations around this interpretation, issuing guidance to schools to act accordingly—and investigating alleged violations.

The scope of the order stands to instantly affect any educational institution that receives federal funding—which includes almost every college in the U.S., as well as the majority of K-12 schools. The Title IX provision in the Education Amendments Act of 1972 prohibits sex-based discrimination in educational activities, though the meaning of that has been hotly contested for decades, mostly recently focusing on its application to transgender students.

In the face of such an order likely affecting all but a handful of the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s 1,100 member schools, the NCAA has indicated that it will move rapidly to change its rules.

“We’re a national governing body and we follow federal law,” NCAA President Charlie Baker told Republican senators in a series of contentious exchanges over the issue during a hearing in December. “Clarity on this issue at the federal level would be very helpful.”

...There are 27 states that have sweeping restrictions on the participation of transgender girls and women in school sports. There are policies mandating their inclusion in another 14 states, which are estimated by transgender-rights advocates to have a larger population of transgender students.
The point of this post is not to debate the rightness or wrongness of President Trump's men-in-women's-sports Executive Order but to point out the dangers of allowing the Federal Government to have financial sway over society's institutions. Perhaps, if you are a liberal, you quietly cheered when the Federal Government threatened to withhold payments to Catholic hospitals that refused to provide abortions.*

How does it feel now that the Trump Administration is using the power of the purse to bend society to its will? You created your own Destructor.

*Question, answered by Grok: did the Federal government threaten Catholic hospitals if they did not provide abortions?

The situation regarding the federal government and Catholic hospitals providing abortions is complex and has evolved over time. Here's a detailed overview based on the available information:

Legal Background:
Federal law, specifically the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), mandates that hospitals provide necessary stabilizing treatment in emergency situations, which can include abortion if a woman's life or health is at risk. However, this conflicts with the religious directives of Catholic hospitals, which generally prohibit abortion.

Legal Cases:
In 2016, a federal court dismissed an attempt by the ACLU to force a Catholic hospital system to provide abortions, calling the challenge "dubious" and stating that the ACLU lacked standing to sue (Washington Times, 2016).

In 2022, a federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. government could not require Christian medical groups, including Catholic hospitals, to perform abortions or gender transition surgeries under the Affordable Care Act, affirming their religious freedom (Reuters, 2022).

Investigations and Warnings:
In 2023, the federal government conducted an investigation where it was found that two hospitals, which included a Catholic facility, violated federal law by refusing to provide an emergency abortion, putting a woman's life in jeopardy (PBS News, 2023). This was a warning to hospitals about the necessity to comply with EMTALA over state abortion laws.

Policies and Practices:
Catholic hospitals operate under the "Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services" set by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which prohibit abortions except in very specific circumstances where the life of the mother is at immediate risk. This often leads to conflicts with federal mandates like EMTALA, where emergency care might necessitate an abortion.

Public and Legal Discourse:
There have been instances where women reported being denied emergency abortions at Catholic hospitals, leading to severe health risks or the need to seek care elsewhere. This has sparked legal battles and discussions about the balance between religious freedom and patient rights to emergency care (ACLU reports, various dates).

In summary, while there have been instances where federal agencies have highlighted that Catholic hospitals must comply with federal emergency care laws, these are not typically framed as direct "threats" but as enforcement of existing laws like EMTALA. The tension arises from the intersection of religious directives and legal obligations, leading to legal disputes rather than explicit threats. However, enforcement actions or investigations by federal agencies can be perceived as pressures or threats to change practices to comply with federal law.

Tuesday, February 04, 2025

Slip Sliding Away

Palos Verdes Peninsula in LA (Fallon/AFP/SFGate)
Rancho Palos Verdes is a coastal city in Los Angeles, west of Long Beach. The city has a population of 42,000 and is known
for its breathtaking ocean views, luxurious homes, and serene environment, [and] has been named the richest retirement town in the country, boasting a median household income of $166,747.
I became familiar with RPV when I helped an aviation executive put together business plans for a startup (we couldn't persuade enough investors to make a go of it). He loved living there not only for the aforementioned attributes but also because its schools made it an excellent place to raise his kids. Now the community is suffering from a slow-moving natural disaster: [bold added]
According to data captured by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory using airborne radar, a portion of the Palos Verdes Peninsula is slipping towards the Pacific Ocean as much as 4 inches per week.
California has experienced its share of natural disasters in recent years. However, its wealthiest residents have generally avoided feeling the consequences....until the Pacific Palisades fire showed that even they are vulnerable.

Repairing Pacific Palisades, and perhaps Rancho Palos Verdes, will require funds that only the Federal Government can provide, yet the Progressives that run California have passed legislation to "Trump-proof" California. Why poke the bear? The moneyed backers of the current regime can only wonder if it is really interested in protecting their interests.

Monday, February 03, 2025

No More Mr. Nice Guy

I just received Time in the morning mail, and the cover reminds me of an old joke.
The good news is that Jesus is coming back.

The bad news is that he's p****d off.
Donald Trump, as even his followers would agree, is not a paragon of virtue even by human standards, but he does wield enormous power as a President whose own party controls both houses of Congress.

(Mr. Trump's power, however, pales before President Obama's, whose Democratic Party held 257 seats in the House and 58 seats--later rising to 60--in the Senate in 2009.)

As to whether he is truthfully angry, all that matters is that his friends and enemies believe he is, and he makes it work for him.

Sunday, February 02, 2025

Priests: Out of Limbo Soon?

Limbo of the Infants: destination of unbaptized infants.
Pope Benedict abandoned the doctrine in 2007.
It is inexcusable that the legal immigration system is so broken that it takes years to process an application. Whatever one's views on immigration, it can't be right or fair to a petitioner, his prospective employer, or his family to keep him in limbo seemingly interminably.

Speaking of limbo ("the border place between heaven and hell where those souls who died without being baptised"), the term's Roman Catholic origins have an ironic contemporary meaning due to the plight of immigrant priests, without whom the American Catholic church would not be able to function.
The Catholic Church in the U.S. doesn’t have sufficient vocations and increasingly relies on immigrants. “We used to send missionaries to other parts of the world,” Bishop Edmund Whalen of New York says. “Now, in a sense, we’re becoming the mission country.” Of the 356 active archdiocesan and extern priests in New York, the bishop says 183 are foreign nationals. The U.S. bishops’ conference recently took stock: With responses from 70% of dioceses and eparchies, it learned that 90% rely on foreign-born religious workers.
Solving the problems specific to Catholic priests is more manageable than fixing the entire immigration system:
Practical relief to the logjam could come in two ways. David Spicer, a lawyer with the U.S. bishops’ conference, says Homeland Security could modify or scrap its regulation—which isn’t mandated by statute—that foreign-born priests have to exit the U.S. for a year once their R-1 visas lapse. The Biden administration informed the conference that it contemplated doing so last fall but failed to follow through. The Trump administration has indicated it may propose a rule in September to offer religious workers more flexibility.

A more durable fix could come through Congress. Sens. Tim Kaine (D., Va.) and Susan Collins (R., Maine) plan to introduce a bill allowing religious workers with pending green-card applications to stay on their R-1s beyond five years. Both Catholic, the senators learned of the issue as it began to affect priests in their states’ parishes. The senators believe their colleagues would overwhelmingly support the measure, but passing any immigration bill has become difficult. They may try fitting the provision into a larger vehicle, say on border security or appropriations.
Presidential Executive Orders being the exception, change in Washington is never instantaneous. However, resolving this issue appears to have bipartisan agreement. Immigrant priests aren't displacing anyone. Let them in. It is abundantly clear that not enough Americans are willing and able to do the job.

Saturday, February 01, 2025

Democrats: Time to Put Up

At the end of yesterday's column by Peggy Noonan ("Trump and the Collapse of the Old Order") she advised Democrats how they can regain power:
Admit what your party’s gotten wrong the past 15 years. Don’t be defensive, be humble.

Most of all, make something work. You run nearly every great city in the nation. Make one work—clean it up, control crime, smash corruption, educate the kids.

You want everyone in the country to know who you are? Save a city.
Gavin Newsom hasn't fixed California
or any of its cities.
The vast majority of Americans are pragmatists, not ideologues. If methods work, people will want to bring them to their own cities and will vote for politicians who will do so.

In California Progressives have been in control for the entire 21st century, yet crime. homelessness, and taxes keep going up, while students' test scores keep going down. California politicians build multibillion-dollar trains to nowhere, cut greenhouse gas emissions by decommissioning working power plants, and enforce speech codes while cities burn and drug deaths escalate.

Peggy Noonan is correct; people recoil in horror at the prospect of spreading California governance to the rest of the country. California has the benefit of its weather and trillion-dollar employers (Apple, Google, Facebook, Nvidia), yet it still can't make a single major city a desirable place to live. It's time to stop spinning narratives, Democrats, show us what you can do.

Friday, January 31, 2025

Inflection Points

(WSJ graphic)
After interviewing politicians of all stripes, WSJ columnist Peggy Noonan says that the old order has collapsed: [bold added]
the great story of the past dozen years or so has been the collapse of the postwar international order that created systems and ways of operating whose dynamics and assumptions were clear, predictable, and kept an enduring peace. You can say the fall began when Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 or Ukraine in 2022. Take your pick, it’s over.

I saw a broad and growing sense in Washington that American domestic politics, or at least that part of its politics that comes from Washington, is at a similar inflection point. That the second rise of Donald Trump is a total break with the past—that stable order, healthy expectations, the honoring of a certain old moderation, and strict adherence to form and the law aren’t being “traduced”; they are ending. That something new has begun. People aren’t sure they’re right about this and no one has a name for the big break, but they know we have entered something different—something more emotional, more tribal and visceral.
Your humble retired blogger has had five employers--all private sector--in his career. All had layoffs and reorganizations. My first experience was in 1980, and, although I was the deliverer, not the recipient of bad news, as a 27-year-old manager it was an upsetting experience; they didn't teach about this in business school.

What "stable order", Peggy? The American majority who never worked in the Federal Government have watched for over one generation as no one seemingly was ever fired for laziness or incompetence. Government employees just put in their time and received a guaranteed pension and medical benefits that exceeded anything most normal people ever got.

So the Trump Administration is firing people? Maybe some don't deserve that fate, which by the way I also thought back in the 1980 layoff that I experienced. Welcome to the real world, guys.