No Fine-Tuning This

iPhone: it's all tariff-able.

Last September I was certain I was going to buy a new iPhone. However, two developments have upended that Apple cart: 1) the delay in rolling out Apple Intelligence; 2) the newly-announced tariff on goods from China, where most iPhones are made.

The WSJ shows how the 54% tariff on Chinese imports raises the cost of the materials that go into the iPhone by 54% (from $549.73 to $846.59). If Apple wants to maintain the same profit margin of 50% on materials, the price of the 256GB iPhone 16 would have to rise by 54% (from $1,100 to $1,694). Such an increase in price will cause some customers to choose the iPhone's competitors who are not experiencing similar price hikes, or at least hold off purchasing a new smartphone. Apple sales will suffer, perhaps a lot, which explains why the stock has fallen 28% from its all-time high.

I am firmly ensconced in the Apple ecosystem and will buy a new iPhone when the creaky 2018 iPhone XS Max gives up its ghost, but not sooner. The WSJ:

This tariff matter is far from settled. Our advice is to hold off on stockpiling last year’s iPhones, and make that one in your hand last as long as it can.

The Sky Isn't Falling

NASDAQ investors feel the pain and pleasure more keenly than those who are broadly diversified

Even the Wall Street Journal can write the-sky-is-falling headline:

Trump’s Tariffs Wipe Out Over $6 Trillion on Wall Street in Epic Two-Day Rout

The message from Wall Street’s epic two-day rout, which destroyed $6.6 trillion in market value: There is nowhere to hide from Trump’s steep tariffs on goods imported from nearly every corner of the planet.

Manufacturers and retailers. Exporters and importers. High tech and low tech. Big names in virtually every industry were hit, from Silicon Valley behemoths like Apple and Meta Platforms to aerospace manufacturer Boeing to oil producer Devon Energy. Shares of private-equity giant Apollo Global Management lost about a fifth of their value this week, as did United Airlines.

When it was all over, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had lost more than 3,000 points for the week, or 7.9%, sending the blue-chip index into a correction. The tech-focused Nasdaq plunged 10% and into a bear market, meaning the index had fallen 20% from its previous high. The S&P 500 sank 9.1%.

The Magnificent Seven group of large tech stocks lost about $1.6 trillion in market value, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

“There are a lot of confused, scared and angry people out there,” said Steve Sosnick, chief strategist at Interactive Brokers.

My portfolio was heavily weighted toward tech stocks during the 2000 dot-com bust and the 2008 financial crisis. Those were nervous times. I didn't understand those crises--and certainly had no confidence in their remedies--but eventually stocks recovered and moved to greater heights.

This time we do understand why markets fell, and it's a reasonable supposition that reversing the tariffs could lead to at least a partial recovery. On the bright side, there's always the chance that they could work in getting other countries to lower their trade barriers during bilateral negotiations. No, the sky isn't falling, at least not yet.

Just Nibbling

My entry points for four stocks

Since the stock market began dropping in February I've been nibbling at stocks that I formerly believed were too expensive relative to their growth prospects. Of course, I had not anticipated the stock market rout from the Trump tariffs announced yesterday, in which case I have bought too soon. (Analysts expect more declines as other countries, especially China, respond with "retaliatory" tariffs.)

I've invested less than 2% of my retirement monies so far and will close my eyes and buy more if declines continue. I am still confident that stock prices will be higher in a year, and though they were not bought at the bottom I will be glad I nibbled.

Tariffs: He Really Meant It

(photo Schiefelbein/AP/American Prospect)

The big news this afternoon was the new tariffs imposed on the rest of the world:

President Trump’s sweeping new tariff plan reverberated through global markets, with U.S. stock futures slumping and the dollar tumbling to its lowest level of the year. Popular stocks such as Apple, Amazon and Nike were among the largest retreaters in offhours trading and oil prices slid.

Here’s what to know:

All U.S. imports will be subject to a 10% tariff, effective April 5.

Trump will impose even higher rates on some nations that the White House considers bad actors on trade. For example, Japan faces a 24% duty and the European Union faces a 20% levy, effective April 9.

China will be hit with a new 34% tariff, adding to previous duties, like the 20% tariff Trump imposed over fentanyl. That means the base tariff rate on Chinese imports will be 54%, before adding pre-existing levies.

The tariffs are pegged to amounts Trump says other countries impose on the U.S. Here’s the math behind the levies.

Some global leaders are vowing to retaliate, while others are hopeful there is still time to strike a deal with the U.S.

Canada and Mexico are excluded from the reciprocal tariff regime. They are still subject to plans to impose 25% tariffs on most imports to the U.S., though the administration has given an exemption for autos and many other goods. Here’s a list of the products and countries exempted from the tariffs.

Trump’s 25% tariffs on foreign-made autos and parts took effect at 12:01 a.m. ET

Four years ago we reflected on the stagflation of the Seventies and how it took years for Ronald Reagan and Paul Volcker to wring inflation out of the system and restore economic growth.

The short-term pain hurt the Republican Party politically in the Eighties and may well hurt it this time as President Trump tries to reset 80 years of globalization and no-import-tariffs "free trade" practiced by the United States and no one else. It was clear to your humble blogger that President Trump did not talk about the pain of his policies in order to get elected, but it is better that he get it out of the way now while his party controls both the House and Senate.

This Time We Mean It

In 2019 we took the Federal Government's warning seriously and went to the Roseville DMV to get our Real ID.

Look for the bear on CA REAL ID's

You will need a REAL ID driver license or ID card if you want to continue using your driver license or ID card to do any of the following:

Board a domestic flight starting October 1, 2020.

Enter secure federal facilities or military bases starting October 1, 2020. (Note: Check with the federal facility/military base before your visit to verify their identification requirements.)

Purchase firearms or ammunition. (Note: Check with the firearms dealer you plan to visit to verify their identification requirements)

Procrastinators have been rewarded, because the Real ID deadline has been postponed three times. However, the Trump Administration seems to be serious when it says that there will be no more extensions.

A May 7 deadline to get a REAL ID is getting a lot more real—and setting off a mad scramble for U.S. travelers who have yet to get one.

Travelers will need a REAL ID-upgraded driver’s license, identification card or another compliant ID, like a passport, to board domestic flights starting on that date. Despite years of previous delays, federal officials say travelers need to take the May 7 date seriously. At Department of Motor Vehicles sites across the country, it appears many are.

Local DMV offices have added hundreds of appointment slots and extended operating hours to meet the flood of Americans trying to get an upgraded ID in time. From Tennessee to Pennsylvania, people report waiting hours in lines that stretch down city blocks or wrap around buildings. Some have flocked to Facebook groups and other social-media forums to strategize on where to find the least-crowded DMV locations. Others are just venting...

About one in five travelers currently flying through U.S. airports doesn’t have a REAL ID or other compliant form of identification, according to Transportation Security Administration officials. That’s despite the requirement being in the works for decades and states issuing REAL IDs since the 2010s.

If an individual had over five years to obtain a Real ID but didn't and now has to wait in long lines, he will not gain sympathy from me.

The silver lining in all this is that the Real ID should satisfy the requirements to prove citizenship and residency for the new Voter ID laws being enacted in various states. In California we had to provide "social security card, birth certificate, two proofs of California residency, e.g., property tax or utility bill or bank statement." Doing it once was a pain but at least once should be enough.

"Potato Chips for Our Dogs"

(Dickson/Chronicle photo)

Bolinas Beach was covered with jellyfish-like velella velella yesterday:

Velella velella are most commonly found on Northern California beaches in spring or early summer, according to scientists at Point Reyes National Seashore. The oval-shaped creatures are related to jellyfish and are typically bluish in color, measuring up to 4 inches long.

“When the prevailing winds shift, such as during a storm, the Velella are driven towards the coast, where they often are stranded on beaches in great numbers,” according to the national seashore’s website. “As the Velella dries out on the beach, it becomes brittle and transparent, looking like a cellophane candy wrapper.”

One velella velella, aka "by-the-wind sailor" due to its
functional sail on top (Bedolfe/One World One Ocean)

As a Southern California native, [retired professor Del] Dickson said he was familiar with Velella velella but had never seen them in such abundance. He said his German shepherd and Cairn terrier excitedly snacked on the sea creatures, which have a small disc of cartilage surrounded by a translucent sail-like structure.

“We call them potato chips for our dogs,” he said.

The sail is not manipulable, so the by-the-wind sailor, as the name indicates, goes where the wind takes it, even if it means to its doom.

Your humble blogger found velella velella to be interesting, but what piqued his interest was its name. How many other creatures have such repetitive names? Grok said these are tautonyms:

Living things with repetitive names, like *Velella velella*, are relatively rare but not unheard of in scientific nomenclature. These names, where the genus and species are identical, are called tautonyms. Tautonyms are allowed in zoology under the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN), but they are prohibited in botany under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN). This means that repetitive names can only occur in animals, not plants, fungi, or algae.

Some well-known examples of tautonyms in the animal kingdom include:

*Gorilla gorilla* (Western gorilla)

*Rattus rattus* (Black rat)

*Bison bison* (American bison)

*Gulo gulo* (Wolverine)

*Meles meles* (European badger)

*Velella velella* (By-the-wind sailor)

Determining an exact number of living things with tautonyms is challenging because no comprehensive, up-to-date global list specifically tracks this across all animal species. Taxonomy is a dynamic field, with species being discovered, reclassified, or synonymized regularly. However, we can estimate based on known patterns and examples.

Zoologists estimate that there are around 1.5 to 2 million named animal species as of recent years (with millions more potentially undiscovered). Tautonyms are a small subset of these names, often arising when a species is the most representative or only known member of its genus at the time of naming. Based on anecdotal evidence and lists compiled by taxonomists, there are likely a few hundred tautonyms in zoology. For instance, a casual survey of mammals, birds, reptiles, and invertebrates yields dozens of examples (e.g., *Canis canis* for a wolf species, *Iguana iguana* for the green iguana, *Bufo bufo* for the common toad), but this is far from exhaustive.

Given that *Velella velella* is a hydrozoan (a type of cnidarian), and considering the diversity of marine invertebrates, it’s plausible that many tautonyms exist among lesser-known groups like jellyfish, worms, or mollusks. However, without a centralized database specifically for tautonyms, a precise count remains elusive. A reasonable estimate, based on expert discussions and taxonomic trends, suggests there could be 200 to 500 tautonyms among living animal species today.

Mom's Memorial Service

Yesterday was the Memorial Service for my mother, Doreen Yuen, who passed away at the age of 95 in December.

As with my father's ceremony in 2019, the sacrament of Holy Communion was held at Honolulu's St. Peter's Episcopal, the church she had attended all her life. Mom's service was livestreamed on YouTube, with relatives tuning in from Australia and the U.S. Mainland.

My brothers and I forsook a lengthy eulogy, and several speakers told stories about Mom. The length of the service was about an hour, and the crowd retired to the Parish Hall for lunch and fellowship while our family placed her urn next to Dad. Everyone seemed to enjoy the celebration of her life.

Her obituary is after the break.

Elon Musk: the Wisdom in His Vision

(Citrin-Safadi/WSJ image)

Elon Musk has so many irons in the fire--Tesla, SpaceX, Starlink (part of SpaceX), and DOGE--that it's fair to wonder of he's one of those serial inventors (maybe the most brilliant and successful in history) who gets an idea and tries to make a business out of it.

What makes more sense is that everything that Elon Musk has done is directed toward establishing a human colony on Mars during his lifetime.

Musk founded SpaceX in 2002 with the mission of taking humanity to other planets. The company infused its culture with that long-term goal and completed a successful launch of its first rocket in 2008. It eventually developed the Falcon 9 rocket, which could be partially reused, lowering the cost of launches and taking market share from incumbent rocket operators.

Musk’s other businesses have contributed to the Mars goal. Musk has described Starlink, a SpaceX division that uses thousands of satellites to provide high-speed internet connections, as a cash machine for a future Mars mission. After Tesla, his electric-car company, gave Musk a stock award in 2018 valued at up to $55.8 billion, he later said it would be used for his space project. “It’s a way to get humanity to Mars,” he said in court in 2022.

Elon Musk has already stated that the goal of colonizing Mars is to preserve the human race when the earth inevitably experiences an extinction-level event. In that light Tesla and Starlink are "cash machines" to fund SpaceX, and DOGE will reduce concerns about the national debt and help the American government fund NASA.

For those who support DOGE and the space program, however, there is a legitimate disagreement with Elon Musk whether Mars should be a higher priority than colonizing the moon:

The White House plans to propose killing a powerful Boeing-built rocket designed for NASA to launch astronauts to the moon and beyond in a coming budget plan, according to people briefed on the plans. Canceling the vehicle, called the Space Launch System or SLS, would potentially free up billions for Mars efforts and set up a clash with members of Congress who support it...

NASA’s program known as Artemis, its long-range plan to explore the moon and eventually Mars, is being rethought to make Mars a priority. One idea: Musk and government officials have discussed a scenario in which SpaceX would give up its moon-focused Artemis contracts worth more than $4 billion to free up funds for Mars-related projects, a person briefed on the discussions said.

NASA’s long-range plan to explore the moon and eventually Mars is under the microscope. NASA has been working on the Artemis program and its predecessors for years. The cost from the government’s fiscal years 2012 through 2025 is estimated at $93 billion, according to the agency’s inspector general.

In January, Musk called the moon program a distraction in a post on X. Days earlier he had criticized Artemis, saying “Something entirely new is needed.”

SpaceX, Boeing and others have billions in contracts to build rockets, ships and lunar landing vehicles, among other technologies, for the program.

Musk has discussed with officials the idea that SpaceX’s moon-focused contracts, valued at more than $4 billion, could be dropped in favor of Mars plans.

Your humble blogger bows to the genius of Elon Musk but believes that the priority should be the moon, not Mars. It does the U.S. no good to be focused on Martian settlements if, say, the Chinese became the dominant lunar power. The latter could well jeopardize the former, just as Iwo Jima and Guadalcanal had to be taken before going after the real, distant objective of the Japanese homeland.

Elon Musk probably believes that Mars needs to be done while he's alive because the project could be abandoned without him, just as NASA lost its mojo after the Apollo program. He needs to have faith that the American people will see the wisdom in his long-term vision after we win the new moon race.

NASA’s role regarding the moon must be reimagined. As we are starting to see in LEO [Low Earth Orbit], Congress must shift funding and priorities so that the centerpiece of U.S. lunar policy becomes enabling private efforts. These pioneering initiatives cannot remain sideshows to the Artemis-Apollo rerun. It’s time to move American enterprise to center stage and let people lead...

Meanwhile, NASA can turn its central focus to putting the first people on Mars. Even if the first mission is a relative sprint, we’ll be learning skills on the moon we’ll need to go further.

Sock Shoes: A Good Idea But I'll Have to Pass

Brave Pudding also has sock shoes for men

Relishing comfort, and being lazy, I initially liked the idea of sock shoes.

[Brave Pudding] sells one style of sock shoes in multiple colors for $380. Made from recycled cashmere with a small amount of a recycled performance stretch blend for durability, Brave Puddings look just like a sock. But the structured interior and recycled rubber sole make them feel and function like proper footwear...

“I was like, what a strange name and interesting shoe,” said Medine Cohen, who writes the popular style newsletter The Cereal Aisle. “I really quickly tried them on and [thought], ‘These are exactly the right bridge shoe when it’s too cold for sandals but you still want to feel like you’re barefoot.’” (The brand is named for a legend of a woman who defied British soldiers during the Revolutionary War by throwing her pudding down a hill in East Hampton instead of feeding them.)

Not having to put on shoes when coming or going is convenient, but sock-shoes don't solve the sanitation problem of tracking dirt and germs into the house. (We always remove our footwear at the entryway.) And I imagine sock-shoes can't be worn in wet weather.

Wearing slippers solves the sanitation problem, but if you're going to do that an ordinary pair of socks will do (although I personally find the slippers-with-socks look cringey). It's a good idea, but I'll have to pass.

Loco Moco in San Bruno

The DHGS loco moco (Yelp photo)

The basic loco moco --rice, burger patty, gravy, and fried eggs--is a simple dish that's on the menu of nearly every Island restaurant, from plate lunch take-out to fancy hotel dining rooms. A good loco moco is distinguished by quality ingredients and a rich, seasoned brown gravy, and we had not found one in the Bay Area until today.

The Diamond Head General Store is a small Hawaiian-themed store and restaurant on El Camino Real in San Bruno, several blocks south of San Bruno Avenue.

The shelves were stocked with snacks and foods (for example, Spam) that are favorites with the people back home. We bought a few items, but the main reason we were there was to order from the restaurant. In addition to the loco moco ($19)--which I liked but others found a little too peppery--we tried the mochiko chicken ($18), which was excellent. The mochiko flour gives the fried chicken crust a distinctive sweetness, and I'm surprised mochiko chicken's popularity hasn't spread beyond Hawaii.

Portions were generous, and there were enough leftovers to supply lunch or dinner the next day. We'll be back.

They Chose Their Target Poorly

Nike Ajax, Hercules, and Zeus missiles

Before there were Nike Shoes, there was the Nike missile defense system:

Nike missile [was] any of a series of U.S. surface-to-air missiles designed from the 1940s through the 1960s for defense against attack by high-flying jet bombers or ballistic-missile reentry vehicles...

Hercules missile sites in the United States were deactivated starting in 1974, after the signing of the Anti-Ballistic Missile [ABM] Treaty with the U.S.S.R. Hercules missiles in Europe were replaced in the 1980s by the more mobile and accurate Patriot system. In Asia, Nike Hercules batteries in Taiwan were active into the 1990s, and South Korea continued to maintain active sites past the turn of the 21st century.

Given that U.S.-based Nike missiles have been deactivated for fifty years, it's unlikely that this vandalism is politically motivated:[bold added]

The National Park Service is seeking the public’s help after extensive vandalism was discovered at the historic SF-88 Nike Missile Site in the Marin Headlands.

The incident occurred between the evening of March 15 and the morning of March 19, when someone broke into the site’s magazine, spray-painted hate speech on the walls and spilled hazardous chemicals inside, according to a bulletin released by the Park Service Wednesday.

The vandals “may have sustained chemical burns and may have needed medical attention,” the bulletin noted.

The crime of run-of-the-mill vandalism doesn't match the severity of chemical burns but your humble blogger admits that he doesn't feel very sorry for the perpetrators.

Nike missile display in the Marin Headlands (National Park Service)

Ideological Shoehorning

Shakespeare's birthplace (Brooks/AP/WSJ)

In yet another example of the ideological capture of a venerable institution, the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust (SBT), founded 1847, is "decolonizing" its extensive Shakespeare properties in Stratford-on-Avon: [bold added]

In 2022, the SBT asked Helen Hopkins, a postgraduate researcher at Birmingham City University who had inspected the trust’s archives for her doctoral thesis, to draw up the indictment. Ms. Hopkins advised that the trust “recognise the role Shakespeare has been forced to play in establishing and upholding imperialistic narratives of cultural supremacy.” The Telegraph cites a research project undertaken by Ms. Hopkins and the trust as saying that to venerate Shakespeare is to support “white, Anglo-centric, Eurocentric, and increasingly ‘West-centric’ views that continue to do harm in the world today.” The idea of Shakespeare’s “universal” genius benefits “the ideology of white European supremacy.” The “racist, sexist, homophobic or otherwise harmful” material in the SBT’s collections commits “epistemic violence,” which is academic-speak for rude words. Wait till they read Shakespeare’s!

Ms. Hopkins recommended the cure: to “purge” the SBT of “Anglocentric and colonialist thought,” so that the SBT’s programming can fix “societal inequities that are embedded in imperialism and associated with Shakespeare’s global cultural status.”

When asked for a copy of the plans, a spokesman for the trust sent us a statement responding to the recent press coverage that read in part, “The collections of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust are a window into what Shakespeare has meant to diverse people across the centuries and around the globe.” But he declined to provide a copy of the report. In a similarly retiring vein Ms. Hopkins has requested that her university library not make her doctoral thesis available to outsiders. This is how “public-facing” institutions react when they are caught betraying the public’s trust.

During the life of William Shakespeare (1564-1616) England was hardly the dominant European power that it would become two centuries later. In his time many states jockeyed for position, including France, Spain, the Holy Roman Empire, Russia, the Dutch Republic, and Prussia.

Of course, Shakespeare wrote from his Englishman's perspective, but to say that he was, intentionally or not, a white supremacist colonizer is the worst kind of shoehorning the 17th-century world into 21st-century ideology.

In honor of the Bard I hope they limit Ms. Hopkins and SBT's output to written reports and don't cause permanent damage to Stratford land and buildings.

SNAP Judgment

One welfare program where cuts are being strenuously resisted is SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, aka "food stamps." Your humble blogger agrees with those who want to keep the program intact (after eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse, of course).

Economists say that letting recipients choose what they buy allows them to achieve maximum utility for themselves. Handing out cash allows them to do that.

Pop-Tarts: on the naughty list? (Guan/Bloomberg/WSJ)

However, distributing cash is a bridge too far for those in charge of welfare programs. Preventing starvation, on the other hand, is a program that nearly everyone can get behind.

Food stamps still afford a wide range of choices. Food stamp rules and restrictions prevent beneficiaries from using welfare funds to purchase undesirable goods like beer and cigarettes.

Over the years the list of items that food stamps cannot be used for has grown:

Hot Food

Beer/wine/other alcoholic drinks

Cigarettes/cigars/other tobacco products

Gasoline

Dog food/cat food/other pet foods

Vitamins/medicine

Baby bottles/diapers/wipes

Forks/spoons/knives/coffee filters

Toilet paper/paper towels/napkins

Tampons/feminine pads

Soap/detergent

Mobile phone cards

Food manufacturers, in addition to revising their forecasts downward in anticipation of SNAP cuts, now have a new worry: [bold added]

The pain could be even worse for manufacturers of sugary and processed foods if efforts to restrict SNAP purchases of soda gain traction and spread to other indulgences. In the past, states have pushed to exclude soda from food stamp eligibility, but the Agriculture Department has historically rejected such proposals.

Trump Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins has signaled she might grant waivers allowing states to impose restrictions.

The narrative is taking hold that sugar is poison; sugar is to health as CO2 is to global warming. Your humble blogger draws the border of the nanny state here. Warn people about the dangers of eating too much sugar, but let them consume what gives them pleasure.

Meanwhile, have a look at the Netflix comedy Unfrosted about the invention of Pop-Tarts. To those of us who lived through the Fifties it's a hilarious remembrance:

A tale of ambition, betrayal, sugar, and menacing milkmen, Unfrosted stars writer-director Jerry Seinfeld.

Part of the genesis of Unfrosted was the simple fact that a serious boardroom meeting about cereal is, well, not very serious. “We love the idea of grown-up men in suits talking about cereal all day,” Seinfeld said. “The silliness of how they look and what they talk about just seemed like a fantastic world to be in.

Facing Life's Tests

Janis Horne reads the NT lesson.

Today's New Testament reading was from 1 Corinthians 10. Here's the excerpt that has given comfort to Christians over the centuries:

God is faithful, and he will not let you be tested beyond your strength, but with the testing he will also provide the way out so that you may be able to endure it.

Sometimes our problems seem to be overwhelming--last year various family members and friends had serious health issues--and everyone followed all the doctors' instructions in addition to praying regularly. A number of congregations also put us on their prayer lists. We were able to get through the dark times by referring to Paul's words that we could endure the most trying tests.

The science is inconclusive about whether prayer really works to heal illness directly--and not everyone got the health outcome we hoped for--but most of us ended the year in reasonably good shape and good spirits. From where we were a year ago, it's a win and I'll take it.

Greenpeace: the Sword Cuts both Ways

Greenpeace ships in 1976 (Wilson/SFGate)

As I entered the working world in the 1970's, the first non-religious, non-educational charity I donated to was Greenpeace. I agreed with its save-the-whales campaign and didn't see any compelling reason that whale-hunting benefited humanity, especially if it meant the extinction of a species.

A few years later I found that my donations had been redirected to Greenpeace's efforts to shut down nuclear power plants. I called, first to complain that their advertising was dishonest, then to ask that my donations be allocated solely to save-the-whales.

Instead of listening to my request, the Greenpeace person spoke about the dangers of nuclear power and why Greenpeace was right to prioritize stopping nuclear. I immediately ceased donations to Greenpeace. I had learned a valuable lesson about the fungibility of money and the trustworthiness of organizations, even those that are titularly non-profit.

Since then Greenpeace has expanded to embrace other leftist causes, most of which I do not support. Advocacy is one thing, but they've finally been spanked for crossing the line to property damage and blocking business operations. [bold added]

The environmental lobby Greenpeace is finally getting its just deserts after a North Dakota jury on Wednesday ordered it to pay $667 million in damages for its thuggish campaign last decade to block the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Pipeline company Energy Transfer LP provided compelling evidence during a three-week trial that Greenpeace defamed the company and abetted vandals. Its organizers trained protesters and even brought lockboxes they used to chain themselves to construction equipment. Protesters lobbed human feces and burning logs at security officers and vandalized construction equipment.

Greenpeace sought to get the pipeline’s financiers to pull out of the project by erroneously claiming the company’s “personnel deliberately desecrated documented burial grounds and other culturally important sites,” among other falsehoods. Energy Transfer said this malicious campaign delayed the pipeline’s construction and increased its costs by hundreds of millions of dollars.

Greenpeace’s defense? Not our fault since it didn’t expressly order the vandalism even if it did train protesters. But even Greenpeace USA’s then executive director boasted it had played a “massive role” in the protests. The jury agreed.

The judicial system is often used by leftists to halt activities that have been approved by the legislative and executive branches. The verdict against Greenpeace shows that the sword can cut both ways.