Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Cruising to Re-Election

The former mayors of SF and Oakland in August
California Senator Dianne Feinstein is cruising to re-election and doesn't see any need to debate her Republican opponent:
she's heard nothing from her challenger, Elizabeth Emken, that she needed to debate. "There's just nothing constructive coming out of their campaign," said the four-term Democratic senator.
That's a hilarious construction--"nothing constructive", when the real reason is that there are many downsides and no upside in debating a little-known opponent. However, there are not many Republicans who are incensed about her pending victory. Dianne Feinstein is a Democrat whom they can work with.

Senator Feinstein has been known to break with the more extreme elements of her party, especially when it comes to national security. She chairs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, one of the least partisan committees in Congress. Whether her role is that of chairman or of ranking minority member, her continued presence should help Senators reach agreement on future issues that will arise in this sensitive area. She has my vote.

[Update: Note how Dianne Feinstein carefully chose her words on October 17th about the Obama Administration's changing story re Benghazi:
"I can tell you this, I think we do know what happened now. There’s no question but that it was a terrorist attack, there is no question but that the security was inadequate and I think that there is no question that we need to work on our intelligence."

“I think what happened was the director of intelligence, who is a very good individual, put out some speaking points on the initial intelligence assessment. I think that was possibly a mistake.”
She didn't give some Republicans the red meat they were looking for--particularly regarding Administration decision-makers' motivations--but she didn't excuse the Administration for the disastrous outcome either. A good politician or someone who's looking out for the national interest? Both, maybe, but if I had to pick one it would be the latter.] © 2012 Stephen Yuen

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

de Tocqueville It's Not

Below is Taiwanese Next Media's take on the Giants' sweep of the Tigers. Fox Sports, are you watching?

Monday, October 29, 2012

Cloud Cover

The Friday night dump is a time-honored tradition for releasing bad or awkward news that one doesn't want to discuss. Once again Apple has shown how it even does obfuscation better than everyone else: send out the press release in the midst of a hurricane that has closed the markets for a couple of days.

The announcement this morning:
Scott Forstall, the man in charge of its iOS mobile software efforts and a major and longtime executive at the tech giant, is leaving next year and will remain an adviser to CEO Tim Cook until then. [snip]

More to come on what happened, but Forstall’s departure is very big news and a drastic move for such an important player in the tech space. He had big fans and also many detractors for his sharp-edged personality, as well as what some described as exhibiting “growing open challenges” to Cook himself. Forstall had previously been called “CEO-in-waiting” in one media account in Fortune.

In addition, numerous sources noted persistent tension between Forstall and several other key execs, especially the powerful design chief [Jony] Ive.

Veiled internal politics at Apple aside, Forstall has been a key part of Apple’s success over the last decade, especially in the development [of the] iPad and the iPhone.
The departure of Scott Forstall, who was in charge of the operating system that runs Apple's most successful products, is "very big news" indeed. Apple could have disclosed the management shake-up at the same time as last Thursday's earnings release, but talking about strategy and people is a lot tougher than talking about numbers, even disappointing ones.

Let's hope Apple's spokespeople have their stories straight when the market re-opens Wednesday.

(Disclosure: I am long Apple.) © 2012 Stephen Yuen

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Under Sunnier Skies

Sergio Romo and Buster Posey (Chron photo)
The San Francisco Giants completed a sweep of the Detroit Tigers and won the 2012 World Series tonight, 4-3,in a hard-fought ten-inning contest. This was the Giants' second title in three years.

The TV ratings for the entire 2012 Series were low, probably due to the Giants' domination and no teams playing from New York, LA, or Chicago, but look at it this way: the Giants' sweep kept the ratings from being even worse by cutting the Series short.

If Detroit had won tonight, Game Five on Monday would have been problematic as a side effect of Hurricane Sandy:
Severe weather bearing down on the Eastern Seaboard could lead to waves as high as 33 feet on parts of Lake Michigan and dangerous conditions on other Great Lakes.

The National Weather Service has issued Great Lakes gale and storm warnings in effect through Wednesday. It says waves on Lake Michigan could be 10 to 18 feet by Monday afternoon, then build to 20 to 33 feet on Tuesday before subsiding. Waves on parts of Lake Superior and Lake Huron could top 20 feet.
A weather delay for a World Series whose conclusion was foregone (all 23 teams leading three games to none have gone on to win the Series in four or five games) would have been ratings death. When would the weather allow Game Five to be played? No one outside California or Michigan would care, especially with political and hurricane news capturing the headlines.

Given their comparative youth--the average age of Sunday's starting lineup was 29--the Giants' success should begin to attract a national following. Then future TV ratings as well as World Series games will occur under sunnier skies. © 2012 Stephen Yuen

Saturday, October 27, 2012

Bad MacBook Drive: Not So Bad

Original 250GB hard drive (bottom left) gave out.
The 2009 MacBook Pro was taking progressively longer to boot up. The screen froze at least once a day, and the Mac had to be turned off by pressing the power button. Disk Utility said that the file structure was corrupted, and the suggested course of action was to erase the hard disk and reinstall everything.

The original OSX (Macintosh operating system) CDs were duly inserted into the optical drive, but the reinstallation came to a halt after a few screens. The hard disk had gone bad.

The hard disk had gone bad are words that fill most computer users with dread, but not those who own Macs and who use the built-in Time Machine program.

Replacing the 250GB hard disk was a simple matter of running down to Fry's and picking up a 500GB replacement drive for about $70. I asked for a solid-state drive but Fry's didn't have any in stock. Sometimes the universe restrains our impulsivity for our own good. The SSD would have cost close to $200, and I really should save the shekels for the new-computer fund.

The physical replacement of the hard drive took only 15 minutes, but the reinstallation and updating of the software, even with Time Machine, took most of the evening. But in the end the whole episode was worth it; the MacBook is operating better than it has in years.

Thoughts:

1) Old (but not old-old) equipment can be easy and cheap to fix, greatly aided by free guides and instructional videos on the Internet.

2) The newest equipment--go ahead and blame Steve Jobs--because of its complexity and compactness is impossible to fix by the do-it-yourselfer. Another reason to go after medium-old stuff, if you can live with not having the most advanced and coolest items to show off in public.

3) It helps to cultivate an attitude of gratitude and a good memory. A 2009 MacBook is an amazing piece of technology compared to the bricks that I used to haul around on business trips ten years earlier.  I'm using only a small portion of its capability and would use even less of the 2012 model with retinal display.  Buy what you need and not what you want, and your chances of obtaining financial freedom are much brighter.
© 2012 Stephen Yuen

Friday, October 26, 2012

An Expensive Math Lesson

It's been eleven years since stock prices were quoted in fractions, e.g, $ 6 ⅞, and were fine-tuned to hundredths, e.g., $6.87 and $6.88.  The economic argument for the switch was clear:  a minimum tick-size of one-sixteenth, for example, often allowed a broker to capture a spread of 6.25 cents between the bid and the asked prices, while a one-penny increment meant that investors paid much less in commissions. It's no surprise that Wall Street wants the fractions to return, at least for low-cap securities. The ostensible reason is that higher profits will motivate brokers to use the equity markets to push the stocks of smaller companies, and these days it's all about helping the little guy.
If you move away from penny pricing, "investment banks will be able to make enough money trading…to write research and re-create the spark in the engine," said Jeffrey Solomon, chief executive of Cowen Group Inc., an investment bank focused on smaller companies.
Your humble observer has a jaundiced view about pay-me-more-so-I-can-help-you-more promises.  Such arguments are extremely self-serving, and the benefits rarely materialize.

Oh, well, in the old days of eighths we became pretty quick at converting fractions in our head, and sixteenths and even thirty-seconds made us expend mental energy.  A fractional revival should raise the math skills of the public, but it will be an expensive lesson.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Cheap But Not Stupid

The car wouldn't start because the battery was drained. (I was in the City, 30 miles from home, so solutions were limited.) I called AAA, and the tow truck came in less than an hour. The driver took less than a minute to jump-start the engine and five more minutes to fill out the paperwork. I was soon on my way.

For most of the 38 years that I've been with triple-A I mainly used the membership to get free street maps. Now that paper maps are obsolete, I had briefly considered canceling the membership, but common sense prevailed. A person whose cars average 15 years of age needs to have a roadside assistance plan. It's okay to be cheap (see reference to 15-year-old cars in previous sentence) but not stupidly so.

Raising the hood not only signals the tow truck but invites birds to perch.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Forecasting is Uncertain, Especially About the Future

The Election
Monday night's debate was the least disputatious of the three debates between President Obama and Governor Romney. The consensus seems to be that the President won the debate but not enough to change the minds of Romney supporters.

For what it's worth, your humble observer thinks that Mr. Obama may still eke out a win, but the likelihood is that Mitt Romney will be the next President, and a good chance that he will win by a significant margin. There is no possibility that President Obama will get even 300 electoral votes (he won 365 in 2008, and 270 are needed to win).

iPad Mini
Tuesday's announcement of the iPad Mini initially triggered disappointment because of its high price relative to the competition:
The iPad Mini tablet, which starts at $329, is a cousin to the original iPad, whose screen is about a third larger. But Apple's smaller tablet is priced well above Amazon.com Inc.'s Kindle Fire HD and Google Inc.'s Nexus 7—two tablets which are similar in size and some specs. Those devices cost $199 or $249 depending on the amount of memory.
Apple also announced upgrades to existing products that were understandably overlooked in the hoopla over the Mini. Macintoshes (Mac-minis, iMacs, and MacBooks) and the regular iPad all have become faster under the hood without a price increase. Our household already has ordered a couple of the new Mac offerings.

As for the iPad Mini, critics would do well to remember how the iPhone 4S took off after an underwhelming reception. It could become the hot new gaming platform or be just the right size for the distaff set--the iPhone screen is too small for many applications, yet the regular iPad is too big to fit in a handbag. Besides, Apple still has room to drop the price later to push sales.

World Series
Please, not another post about the Giants, you say, but after tonight's game how can we not comment? The Giants were heavy underdogs in Game 1 to Detroit and its otherworldly pitcher Justin Verlander.

Three home runs in one World Series game by third baseman Pablo Sandoval---a feat matched by only three other players (Babe Ruth, Reggie Jackson, and Albert Pujols) in history---and a superb performance by supposedly washed-up pitcher Barry Zito added compelling drama to a game that an 8-3 final score would normally belie. Some over-the-top sports reporters are completely reversing their original predictions and calling the Series "over" because the Giants beat the Tigers' ace in one game.

Whoa, the ball takes funny bounces, political sentiments can shift overnight, and tech dross can turn into gold and vice versa. Forecasting is uncertain, especially about the future. © 2012 Stephen Yuen

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Seriously?

Waiting for the last out (Chron photo)
The Giants won the National League pennant by defeating the St. Louis Cardinals, 9-0, in the rain at AT&T Park. They blew the game open in the third inning on an odd broken-bat hit by rightfielder Hunter Pence [bold added]:
The ball broke Pence's bat as he made contact. Replays showed that as the barrel busted, the bat hit the ball two more times, imparting wicked spin and forcing the ball to change course.

That explains why shortstop Pete Kozma initially broke to his right, then had to do a 180 and go left. His diving attempt was futile. The ball rolled into center field and two runs scored on the hit. Buster Posey then rumbled home from first for a 5-0 lead when Jon Jay bobbled the ball.
The downpour intensified during the ninth inning, making the odds of a Cardinal comeback even more remote. Perhaps realizing the inevitability of the outcome, the umpires refused to postpone the game, which ended in a driving rainstorm.

Satellite photos showed the center of the storm to be over AT&T Park while the rest of the Bay Area only had a few sprinkles. The Pence hit and the sudden squall provide more evidence that strange forces are at work during this postseason: the Giants have won six straight "elimination" games in which the opponent--first Cincinnati and then St. Louis--could have ended the series by winning just once. The Giants heroes were players whose skills had been on the decline for years but who were now hitting (and pitching) like Babe Ruth.

The World Series starts Wednesday against the Detroit Tigers, who are favored by most experts because of their superior line-up. I'm betting on the baseball gods, however. Giants in 7.

Monday, October 22, 2012

2012 May Came Close

He's happier now.
When we got his autograph in September he was struggling. Now he very well may be the hero of the National League Championship Series.

Pitcher Ryan Vogelsong helped the Giants catch up with the Cardinals at one game apiece last week in a 7-1 pitching gem. On Sunday night he struck out nine batters in a must-win 6-1 victory for the Giants. Tonight the Giants and Cardinals face off in Game 7 to decide who will go to the World Series.

The national media is taking note of "one of baseball’s best comeback stories."
After spending parts of six seasons in the majors from 2000 to 2006, Vogelsong languished in the minors and in Japan until 2011, when he got a second chance with the team that drafted him. Now, at age 35, he’s been the Giants’ best pitcher of this postseason.
The Giants won't top the swell of emotion and joyful surprise of their 2010 Championship season. But if Ryan Vogelsong, Barry Zito, and some of their other given-up-for-dead teammates do go all the way, 2012 will come close.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

George McGovern, R.I.P.

George McGovern and Sargent Shriver, 1972 (Chron photo)
George McGovern, who died this morning at the age of 90, was the first Presidential candidate I voted for.

Unlike most of my college classmates, my political leanings in 1972 were actually closer to those of his opponent.

But I couldn't stand Richard Nixon.

In my youthful idealism--some might call it naivete--I believed strongly that character trumped ideology. Senator McGovern, a war hero turned peace advocate, was far more principled and honorable than the small man who occupied the White House, the man who ordered the bombing of Cambodia, the mining of Haiphong Harbor, and, probably, even the "third-rate burglary" at the Watergate Hotel.

The American public was horrified that George McGovern declared that the war was hopelessly lost. He said that he would unilaterally pull out of Vietnam, which is what happened anyway three years later under President Ford. George McGovern lost 49 states in a 520-17 Electoral College blowout.

After leaving office George McGovern fought against hunger and for human rights, dignity, and peace. He always spoke his mind, not dissembling as most politicians do. And he wasn't afraid to admit when he had changed his views:
For several years Mr. McGovern was proprietor of the Stratford Inn in Stratford, Conn. After the inn went belly-up, he wrote an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal in 1992 urging legislators to reduce red tape and frivolous lawsuits.
"I…wish that I had had this firsthand experience about the difficulties that businesspeople face every day," he wrote.
Although he was defeated, George McGovern shaped his party's politics for a generation. His formerly "radical" positions are now in the mainstream of Democratic Party thought. Per former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle: "I believe America would be a better nation today if George McGovern had become president." Amen.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

163rd Diocesan Convention

As Bay Area residents frolicked in the sunshine, 300 Episcopalians chose to spend their Saturday indoors at Grace Cathedral in San Francisco. It was the 163rd Convention of the Diocese of California.

(Historical footnote: the Diocese encompasses only seven Bay Area counties but has appropriated the "California" designation due to primogeniture. There are now other, larger Episcopal Dioceses in California, e.g., Los Angeles and San Diego.)

Bishop Marc Andrus led by example on his 56th birthday and presided over an uncontroversial agenda. Three resolutions passed by large margins:

1) Every meeting of every committee, no matter what its purpose, shall begin by asking the question, "How will what we are doing here affect or involve people living in poverty?"

2) Martin Luther King, Jr. Day will be a Day of Service for all members of the congregation and particularly for children and youth.

3) The Diocese declares its support of California Proposition 34, also known as the Anti-Death Penalty Initiative.

Fortunately this year, there were no discussions or proposals that upset Episcopalians who do not call themselves progressives. (Bishop Andrus has declared that he is in "the progressive wing of The Episcopal Church"; his advocacy of same-sex marriage--the official position of the church is that it will perform blessings over same-sex relationships--has resulted in a spat with the local Catholic archbishop.)

Two months ago this humble observer half-jokingly commented about church leadership:
Why don't they just say what they really believe? From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.
Well, the Bishop did use Karl Marx's famous dictum in response to a question about wealth redistribution among the parishes and missions, and he said it as if he meant it. No wonder we're a dying denomination.
© 2012 Stephen Yuen

Friday, October 19, 2012

Numbers The President Can Brag About

During President Obama's term all indices are much higher - Dow +68%, S&P +78%, NASDAQ +113%
The Republicans have been barraging the airwaves with numbers, e.g., $16 trillion national debt, $5 gasoline, and 8% unemployment, and it appears from the latest poll numbers that the Obama campaign is withering under the onslaught.

But there's one set of numbers that the President can brag about. The stock market has moved substantially higher during his term.

It's surprising that Democrats haven't publicized this more. Perhaps the omission is because of the mistaken belief that only fat cats in the top 1% care about equities (vilifying the 1% is part of the Democratic strategy). But the majority of American households now holds stock market assets through 401(k) plans, IRAs, and regular brokerage accounts and has benefited from the Obama market.

If, for example, a household had $100,000 in stocks and mutual funds when President Obama entered office, that amount now is likely to be worth at least $200,000, assuming reinvestment of dividends and no withdrawals. This appreciation would have gone a long way toward mitigating the effects of the recession and fall in home prices.

Under most measures we wouldn't want the next four years to look like the last four....unless we're talking about the stock market.

If President Obama would give us a plausible reason that the Dow Jones Industrial Average would be another 68% higher when he leaves office in 2016, many disillusioned investors-voters would give him another look. © 2012 Stephen Yuen

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Google: Unexpected and Disappointing

Google's third quarter results disappointed investors [bold added]:
Google posted a third-quarter profit of $2.18 billion, or $6.53 a share, down from $2.73 billion, or $8.33 a share, a year earlier. Excluding stock-based compensation and other items, profit fell to $9.03 from $9.72 a share. Revenue, excluding traffic acquisition costs, improved to $11.33 billion.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters expected earnings of $10.65 a share and net revenue of $11.86 billion.

Total costs jumped 71%.
Google had been on a roll. It continues to dominate Internet search and Internet advertising. Smartphones that use the Android operating system outnumber everyone else's. Well-publicized missteps by its rivals made it seem like we were in the age of Google, not Apple or Facebook.

Until today.

Net income per share, excluding stock-based compensation and other items, fell 7.2% versus the same quarter last year, instead of rising 9.6% as the analysts expected. The disappointing results sparked reassessment, and the stock fell 8%.

Sidebar: a big "oops" moment occurred when financial printer R.R. Donnelley & Sons disclosed the results three hours before the market closed:
The premature posting rattled markets, and led to a 2½-hour halt in trading of Google shares from 12:50 p.m. to 3:20 p.m. ET.
Believers in the semi-strong form of efficient capital markets may be cheered by this example of how quickly Google shares adjusted to the "right" price. Trading was halted for 2½ hours to allow market participants to digest the new information, yet the price remained about the same after trading resumed.

Flashback: nine months ago Google had a negative earnings surprise, and the stock fell $53.58 (8.3%) to $585.99. That would have been an excellent time to buy: GOOG is 19% higher, even after today's drop. I still have no idea whether it's a good investment.

Disclosure: I have positions in Apple but not in Google or Facebook.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Shaky Anniversary

Today is the 23rd anniversary of the Loma Prieta earthquake. To my personal recollection there's not much to add to the post of three years ago.

In 1989 the third game of the World Series at Candlestick Park was about to start when the quake hit at 5:04 p.m. In 2012 the Giants are playing in the third game of the National League Championship Series, indicative of the increase in the number of playoff rounds. This year's World Series could extend into November.

The quake demolished the double-decker freeway that blocked the view of the buildings.