Repairing downed power lines in March (Merc photo) |
Since the year 2000 the utility has declared bankruptcy twice, because of rising fuel costs in 2001 and wildfire liabilities in 2019. However, the over-riding reason, IMHO, is that it's impossible to meet all the goals that the regulators have set for it; any unforeseen major problem was bound to put the company under.
Exhausted from listening to their criticisms, your humble blogger advocated a takeover of PG&E in 2019 by the Progressives so that they could show how to accomplish their conflicting goals:
The latest requirement is that PG&E has been tasked with a billing adjustment that affects millions of ratepayers in the name of "equity."force the complete conversion to alternative energy from fossil-fuel sources keep rates at current levels (or lower); repair its aging infrastructure to prevent more San Bruno pipeline explosions pay their unionized workers a fair wage; bury more power lines both to prevent forest fires and to protect the public from downed lines.
The changes would affect only those customers who receive electricity services from PG&E and its sibling power companies.Just how will PG&E determine its customers' income? Will it have access to and security for Franchise Tax Board data?
Here’s how the fixed charges would work in the PG&E service territory. The numbers are based on a four-person household:
Households earning less than $28,000 a year would pay a fixed charge of $15 a month on their electric bills. Households with annual income from $28,000 to $69,000 would pay $30 a month. Households earning from $69,000 to $180,000 would pay $51 a month. Those with incomes above $180,000 would pay $92 a month.
It's hard enough for businesses to determine pricing strategies for their products; will they now have to price differentially according to customers' income?
The Progressives who run the State government surely have the answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment